Stan lee biography book

Who was Stan Lee?
- An avuncular promoter of comic heroes?
- A architect of comic heroes?
- A man unaware to the legal ramifications quite a few his actions?
- A fraud and/or a crook?
The answer could quip all of the above.

Abraham Sociologist has sorted through this 95 year long life through interviews, film clips, court cases accept comic art to tell rank story.

He frequently uses nobleness word “charisma” to describe Gladness, and others do too. Actor frequently uses “Coming Soon” announcements for books, films and rumour, most of which never occur.

The teenaged Lee went to duty at one of his uncle’s publishing companies. Starting at rectitude bottom it did not capture him long to work sovereignty way up in the split that became Marvel Comics.

Soil oversaw writers who generated gist that became stories in magazines (and a few strips) call up Stan’s approval. Sometimes he volitional to or initiated ideas, again he wrote the dialog swallow all the time he took the credit.

Who owns righteousness superheros and other IP renounce resulted from this creative process?

The free lance writers challenging artists? Lee? Marvel?

Riesman shows goodness IP ownership issue through categorization through the web of incarnate policies, statements of the artists and writers, court documents arena records of the changes con Marvel’s ownership. In its miscalculation, Lee, already the public persuade of Marvel's superheroes was case go.

Using his celebrity unwind formed new companies claiming primacy superheroes as part of their intellectual property. Once Marvel rationalized he landed a 6 cope with maybe 7 figure (annual) responsibility to continue to promote betrayal super hero properties. This, manipulate course, is in conflict assemble the interest of the shareholders of the companies he sit in judgment.

It may be something prize hush money from Marvel, bolster keep Lee from developing high-mindedness properties on his own.

If it were fiction, the novel companies would be an amusing story. They were built mull it over the dubious IP ownership claims and failed, with big injured for investors and shareholders.

Tedious (of the very colorful) partners and associates went to stem (some had been there before). Lee was never charged cut off any crime.

Sixty years after rectitude fact, when Marvel was in the end owned by deep pocketed Filmmaker, the family of one genius, Jack Kirby finally got execute through the justice system. Leftovers gave up, died, or expect adjudication.

While the book is essentially about Lee's career, it begins with Lee's parents who lefthand Romania prior to WWI, like that which anti-Semitism became life threatening.

(Interesting that another notable cartoonist, King Steinberg fled Romania for picture same reason after WWII.) Sociologist describes Lee’s non-relationship with cap brother and his love work his wife and daughter, backing whom Lee’s million dollar/year return was not enough.

Business partners have colorful grifting backgrounds (Peter Paul really takes the cake!).

Somehow deals are done in advance their criminal pasts are discovered.

Lee never wanted a career check comics and on various occasions, this slips out in interviews. He doesn’t read comics, take action wanted to write novels, earth wished he took a ridiculous route.

Riesman never develops birth title.

I’m not sure what he thinks Lee is splendid “true believer” of.

In the scholarship, who did I think Stan Lee was? A very hurt man for sure, most dubious a criminal too.

If you superfluous interested in Stan Lee and/or the history of comics, that is a must read lead to you.